Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is better than the vivo X70, with an 81.9 score against 73.8. Although the Google Pixel 4 is older and a little bit thicker than vivo X70, it's design is still somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 4 has a little sharper screen than vivo X70, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher screen pixels density.
The vivo X70 features a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo X70 has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X70 counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photos and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the vivo X70 also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Vivo X70 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.