Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is way better than the vivo X70, getting an 89 score against 73.8. Even though the Google Pixel 5 is older and just a little thicker than vivo X70, it's design is still somewhat lighter. Vivo X70 counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 5. They have 8 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores.
The Google Pixel 5 has a slightly better display than vivo X70, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixels density. The Google Pixel 5 has as much memory for apps and games as the vivo X70 one, both have equal 128 GB internal memory.
Vivo X70 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos and a smaller sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Vivo X70 counts with a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.