Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 has a score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than the vivo X70's global score of 73.8. The HTC U11 is a notably older and a little thicker cellphone than the vivo X70, but HTC managed to build it just a little bit lighter anyway. The HTC U11 counts with a little more vivid display than vivo X70, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Vivo X70 features just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 also has more RAM. Vivo X70 captures much clearer videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing lower quality photos and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The vivo X70 has a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The vivo X70 has a much longer battery duration than HTC U11, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.