Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than the vivo X70, with a global score of 87.1 against 73.8. LG Velvet is an older and a bit thicker cellphone than the vivo X70, but LG could make it just a little bit lighter anyway. Vivo X70 features a little bit better performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The vivo X70 and the LG Velvet both feature quite similar screens, and although the LG Velvet has a quite larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution, they both have the same display density. The LG Velvet counts with just a bit better camera than vivo X70, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Velvet also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture, a much bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a more megapixels back facing camera.
LG Velvet counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than vivo X70, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo X70 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.