Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is better than the vivo X70, having a general score of 81.3 against 73.8. Even being the best in this comparison, Galaxy A31's construction is older, a bit heavier and thicker than vivo X70. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A31 has older 10 version while vivo X70 has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a screen that's just as good as vivo X70's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A31 has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Galaxy A31 has a greater storage for apps and games than vivo X70, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X70 features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X70 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A31 counts with just a little better battery life than vivo X70, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4400mAh. The vivo X70 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a lot smaller back camera sensor and a camera with a worse 40 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.