Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | -- |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is much better than vivo X70, getting an 82 score against 73.8. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide very similar OS features. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only design is extremely lighter but just a bit thicker than the vivo X70, and both were released only 7 months apart.
Vivo X70 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 also has more RAM. Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a little sharper display than vivo X70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better display pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than vivo X70, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a little better battery life than vivo X70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
The vivo X70 captures a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.