Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than the vivo X70, having a global score of 83.8 against 73.8. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a a little bit lighter phone than the vivo X70, but they are 0.3inches thick. The vivo X70 has a bit better performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A50 has a screen that is just as good as vivo X70's screen, because although the Galaxy A50 has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Vivo X70 takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor offering a lower image quality and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X70, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo X70 has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.