Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than vivo X70, having an 85.5 score against 73.8. Although Galaxy A51 is older and a little thicker than vivo X70, it's body is still just a little lighter. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The vivo X70 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A51 has a screen that is very similar to the display in vivo X70, because although the Galaxy A51 has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch in the display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X70, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a slightly better camera than vivo X70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a back camera with more MP and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
The vivo X70 has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 10 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.