Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism cube black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is a lot better than vivo X70's overall score of 73.8. Both devices in this review include the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide all the same operating system features. Even being the best in this comparison, it must be told that it's also older, thicker and a bit heavier.
Vivo X70 features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Vivo X70 and Galaxy A51 5G have incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy A51 5G has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little higher pixels density.
The Galaxy A51 5G captures just a bit better videos and photos than vivo X70, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images and video, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a back camera with more mega-pixels and a much larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X70, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G features a little longer battery life than vivo X70, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.