Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is a lot better than vivo X70's 73.8 score. Samsung Galaxy A52s's body is just a bit thicker and a little heavier than vivo X70. Both devices in this comparison review have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should give the same operating system features.
Vivo X70 has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 also has more RAM memory. The vivo X70 and the Samsung Galaxy A52s have really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a bit better camera than vivo X70, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution, a way larger camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photographs and a larger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light environments.
Galaxy A52s counts with a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than vivo X70, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52s also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s features just a bit better battery duration than vivo X70, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.