Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-10 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than vivo X70, getting a 76.9 score against 73.8. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but Galaxy A70 has an older 10 version and vivo X70 has Android 11 version. Although it's the best in our current comparison, we must tell that it's also a older, a little heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone.
The vivo X70 counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2376px, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X70, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The vivo X70 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A70 has a little better battery lifetime than vivo X70, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The vivo X70 features a way better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light captures and a smaller sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X70 also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.