Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-09-10 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 is slightly better than vivo X70, having a overall score of 78.9 against 73.8. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Galaxy M20 has the older 10 version while vivo X70 has Android 11. The Galaxy M20 is a better device than the vivo X70, we must note that it's also a noticeably older, thicker and just a little bit heavier device.
The vivo X70 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X70 features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px.
Vivo X70 has a greater camera than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the vivo X70 also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors. Galaxy M20 has a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than vivo X70, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy M20 counts with just a little better battery duration than vivo X70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.