Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the vivo X70's 73.8 score. Galaxy Note 3 is a noticeably older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the vivo X70, but Samsung was able to build it a little lighter anyway. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while vivo X70 has Android 11 version.
Vivo X70 features a little better processing power than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and more CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a little more vivid display than vivo X70, although it has a little worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, a bit less pixels per inch of display and a little smaller display.
The vivo X70 has a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Vivo X70 shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video definition, the vivo X70 also has a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments, faster 60 fps video frame rates, a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos and a lot better resolution camera.
Vivo X70 features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 4400mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.