Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-10 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than vivo X70, with a 93.6 score against 73.8. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect. Galaxy S10 5G is a older, just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than vivo X70.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a bit sharper screen than vivo X70, because it has a better screen pixels density, a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a bit larger display. The vivo X70 features a bit better processor than Galaxy S10 5G. They have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X70 shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture and a tinier camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X70 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X70, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a little better battery performance than vivo X70, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.