Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is much better than the vivo X70, having an 86.3 score against 73.8. Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is incredibly older and just a bit thicker than the vivo X70, it's design is still somewhat lighter. The Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better looking display than vivo X70, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels amount in each inch of display.
Vivo X70 counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S10e counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X70, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S10e also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X70 shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and videos in low-light situations and a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X70 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera.
The vivo X70 features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4400mAh battery size against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.