Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is way better than vivo X70's global score of 73.8. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version while vivo X70 has Android 11 version, counting with some extra features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S20 is older and just a little bit thicker than the vivo X70, it's design is still a bit lighter.
The Galaxy S20 features a processing unit that's very similar to the vivo X70 one, and although the Galaxy S20 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a slightly better looking screen than vivo X70, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The vivo X70 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos and a lot tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a way bigger storage for games and applications than vivo X70, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Vivo X70 features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.