Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is way better than vivo X70, having a 90.8 score against 73.8. Although it's the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is an older, a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone than vivo X70. These phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should offer identical operating system features.
Galaxy S20 FE has a bit more vivid display than vivo X70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than vivo X70, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
The vivo X70 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit longer battery performance than vivo X70, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Vivo X70 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and a lot smaller sensor giving a lot lower image quality, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the vivo X70 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.