Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than vivo X70, getting a score of 98 against 73.8. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is older, thicker and heavier than vivo X70. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version while vivo X70 has Android 11, so it offers some nice extra features.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's processing unit is just as good as the vivo X70 one, and although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a higher amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better screen than vivo X70, because it has a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a greater pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than vivo X70, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution back camera, a bigger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X70, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better battery lifetime than vivo X70, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.