Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Phantom black and Silver |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 Ultra has a general score of 98.1, which is way better than the vivo X70's 73.8 overall score. Although Galaxy S21 Ultra is better than the vivo X70, we must note that it is also a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. These devices include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than vivo X70, because it has a higher pixel amount per inch of screen, a little bit larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a processing unit that's just as good as the CPU in vivo X70, and although the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has 4 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra takes greater photographs and videos than vivo X70, because it has a lot bigger camera sensor, a back camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra features as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the vivo X70, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has just a bit longer battery life than vivo X70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.