Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is way better than the vivo X70, getting a 93.4 score against 73.8. Samsung Galaxy S22's body has the same thickness than the vivo X70, but it's a little lighter. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version while vivo X70 has Android 11 version, providing some nice extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy S22 features a lot better display than vivo X70, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit better count of pixels per inch of display. Vivo X70 has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S22. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 captures slightly better videos and photos than vivo X70, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a camera in the back with more mega pixels, a lot larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 and vivo X70 both count with similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X70 features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has a 19 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.