Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than the vivo X70's score of 73.8. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and vivo X70 has Android 11. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is older and just a little heavier than vivo X70, it's body is still just a little thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little sharper screen than vivo X70, because it has a quite larger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a little bit better pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a processing unit that's just as good as the vivo X70 one, both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 8 GB of RAM.
Vivo X70 features a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos and a tinier back-facing camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the vivo X70 also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features much more storage to install applications and games than vivo X70, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X70 features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.