Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is better than the vivo X70's global score of 73.8. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's body is older, somewhat heavier and thicker than the vivo X70. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and vivo X70 has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little bit better screen than vivo X70, because although it has a little lower pixel count per inch of display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger screen. The vivo X70 features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a superior camera than vivo X70, and although they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a way more megapixels camera, a lot larger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a way better 7680x4320 video quality. The vivo X70 and the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro feature really similar memory capacity to store more apps and games, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than vivo X70, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.