Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is just a bit better than the vivo X70, getting a score of 76.6 against 73.8. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has 10 version while vivo X70 has Android 11 version. Even being the best device in this review, it must be told that it is also an older, somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier device.
Vivo X70 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 also has 5 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X70 has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a quite inferior pixel amount per display inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376.
The vivo X70 has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X70 features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a back camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos and a lot tinier camera sensor, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than vivo X70, because it has a 14% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.