Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is just a bit better than the vivo X70, having an 81.1 score against 73.8. Even being the best phone we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro construction is older, thicker and heavier than the vivo X70. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version and vivo X70 has Android 11 version.
Vivo X70 has a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 also has more RAM memory. Vivo X70 has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2376px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes clearer videos and photos than vivo X70, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much more MP camera and a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a greater storage for games and applications than vivo X70, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than vivo X70, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.