Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-09-26 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.37 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14T Pro has a general score of 84.5, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel XL's 81.3 score. The Xiaomi 14T Pro body is noticeably newer and just a little thinner, but heavier than Google Pixel XL. The Google Pixel XL features a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM.
Xiaomi 14T Pro features a much better display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a bit lower pixels quantity in each display inch and a little worse resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen. Xiaomi 14T Pro has a lot better camera than Google Pixel XL, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos, a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a larger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi 14T Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.