Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-05-08 | 2021-01-22 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Blasting black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 484 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A32's 84.7 score. Although it's the best in this review, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a thicker and just a bit heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy A32. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro comes with Android 10 OS, and Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a better display than Galaxy A32, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a quite larger display and a lot better display density. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rate and a much better resolution camera. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has slightly more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A32's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery performance in Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.