Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-08 | 2017-02-24 |
| 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blasting black | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 484 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a global score of 90.1, which is better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's global score of 81. Even though the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, it's heavier and extremely thicker. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a brighter screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger screen, a greater pixels density and a way better 1440 x 3120px resolution. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot more MP back facing camera, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better images in low light environments. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.