Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-05-08 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A32, getting a score of 86.6 against 84.7. Even though the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A32, it must be noted that it's also a thicker and just a bit heavier phone. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has Android 10 OS, while Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a bit larger display, a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a superior camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a camera with a way higher resolution and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Galaxy A32 has just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.