Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.83 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.56 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a older, a little heavier and way thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. These devices include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a larger screen and a little higher pixel amount in each display inch. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 4720mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a back facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much larger sensor, a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a way higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.