Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-10-13 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.57 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4820mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, with a general score of 84.7 against 81.2. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, and Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has Android 10 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A32 design is a little bit thicker but just a bit lighter than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and both of them were released only 3 months apart.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a quite bigger screen, a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a better pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower 48 mega-pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A32 counts with a little better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4820mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.