Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.61 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Citrus Yellow, Mint Green and Truffle Black | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 5 nm (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4250mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has a general score of 85, which is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite body is extremely lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's thicker and was released many years before. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has the previous 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has a lot better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a bigger display, a little better screen pixel density and a much brighter screen. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser cores and 10 GB less RAM.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 4250mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because although it has a camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.