Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 8.25 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Ceramic Black and Ceramic White | Black and White |
| Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1700 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 8.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Although the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, we must note that it's also incredibly older, thicker and a bit heavier. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels count per inch of display, it also counts with a really brighter screen, a bigger screen and a little higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has better video frame rate, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because it has more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.