Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-02-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Horizon blue and Midnight gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a general score of 88.8 against 77.8. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 11 is incredibly older and notably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 11 has older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Mi 11 features a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 11, because although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen, a bit higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and much more brightness.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 11, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 11, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi 11 takes slightly better pictures and videos than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 11 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.