Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is much better than Xiaomi Mi-3, having a overall score of 84.6 against 71.6. Both devices we are comparing have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2. Even being the best in this review, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a incredibly heavier and a little thicker phone than Xiaomi Mi-3.
The Xiaomi Mi-3 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Xiaomi Mi-3 counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi-3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a bigger aperture and a way higher resolution back facing camera. The Galaxy A22 5G features much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi-3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A22 5G has a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.