Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a score of 79.9, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi-3's score of 71.6. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than Xiaomi Mi-3. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
Xiaomi Mi-3 features a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Xiaomi Mi-3 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density.
The Galaxy A25 5G captures way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a way better (4K) video resolution, a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger camera aperture. Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a way better battery life than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a 64% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.