Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 14 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is better than the Xiaomi Mi-3, having a 79.4 score against 71.6. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has the previous 14 version while Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Mi-3, but it is way heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi-3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Xiaomi Mi-3 has a way better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional GPU.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G shoots way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video quality, a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a very superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a 64 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.