Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is better than the Xiaomi Mi-3's 71.6 overall score. Galaxy A50's construction is heavier but just a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Mi-3. Xiaomi Mi-3 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A50 and Xiaomi Mi-3 feature incredibly similar processing units, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (although they are slower).
The Galaxy A50 counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi-3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also has a way larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations and a camera with much more mega-pixels. The Galaxy A50 counts with greater battery life than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a 31% greater battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.