Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is a lot better than Xiaomi Mi-3's general score of 71.6. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, the Galaxy A52 construction is just a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier than Xiaomi Mi-3. Xiaomi Mi-3 features a brighter display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Mi-3 and Galaxy A52 both count with similar processing units, because although the Galaxy A52 has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and 4 more CPU cores. The Galaxy A52 captures much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory. The Galaxy A52 features a much longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a 48 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.