Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi-3's 71.6 global score. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing, the Galaxy F62 construction is extremely heavier and thicker than Xiaomi Mi-3. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Xiaomi Mi-3 features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a processor that is very similar to Xiaomi Mi-3's processor, because although the Samsung Galaxy F62 has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, and they both have 4 cpu cores, it also counts with 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy F62 takes much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a lot higher (4K) video definition, a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera and a bigger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.