Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi-3's 71.6 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's body is somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier than Xiaomi Mi-3. The Galaxy S7 Active has just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has a better screen pixel density, a quite larger screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi-3 has a bit faster processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi-3 also counts with an additional GPU. The Galaxy S7 Active features a greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 200 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has a camera with a lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a much bigger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3050mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.