Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.1 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.67 x 2.90 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 441 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2360 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is better than Xiaomi Mi-3's 71.6 global score. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is a lot heavier and thicker than the Xiaomi Mi-3. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Mi-3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
Xiaomi Mi-3 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a little bit smaller display. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi-3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and more processing cores.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi-3, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi-3 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi-3 also counts with a better 13 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way better battery life than Xiaomi Mi-3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Mi-3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi-3. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Mi-3, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.