Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.55 x 2.81 x 0.20 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 419.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi 5's general score of 73.7. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 5, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 5 has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels in each inch in the screen. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi 5, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with a much better 108 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 5, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features greater battery life than Xiaomi Mi 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi 5, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.