Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-29 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Metal | -- |
| $ 345.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is much better than Xiaomi Mi 5s, with a global score of 88.1 against 76.4. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Samsung Galaxy F62 is a noticeably newer phone than the Xiaomi Mi 5s, but it's thicker and notably heavier.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Galaxy F62 also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 5s features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density and a brighter display.
Samsung Galaxy F62 captures much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a way better resolution camera in the back, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 119% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.