Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-28 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 6, getting a score of 77.8 against 76.5. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is extremely newer and noticeably thinner than Xiaomi Mi 6's, but it's a lot heavier. The Xiaomi Mi 6 features a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better screen than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a really brighter display and a really larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes greater photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a way larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a larger aperture to take better low light images and video and a lot better video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has more internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Mi 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Mi 6. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Mi 6, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.