Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-15 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has an overall score of 81.4, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's overall score of 79.7. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G Stylus, even though it was released a bit more over a year before. These phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a little sharper screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a slightly better camera than Moto G Stylus, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures in low-light environments, they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same video frame rate, the same back camera sensor size and a 48 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much better storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G Stylus features better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.