Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-15 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a general score of 81.4 against 77.8. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is a notably older and a lot thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi was able to build it incredibly lighter anyway. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has newer 9.0 Pie version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, so it provides you lots of additional features and performance tweaks.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better display than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a little bit inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a much brighter screen, a way better 2200 x 2480px resolution and a much bigger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 384 GB more internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.