Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-09-24 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.50 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Titanium | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2250 x 2088 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 389 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is slightly better than iPhone XS Max, having a global score of 88.9 against 84.5. Even though Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is newer than the iPhone XS Max, it is noticeably thicker and somewhat heavier. The iPhone XS Max has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels, it also counts with a little better pixel density.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 448 GB more internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone XS Max features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a lower number of cores and slower and 8 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha shoots clearer photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a larger camera aperture, a back camera with way more megapixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has improved battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity against 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.