Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-09 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 377.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 80.6 score against 77.8. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a notably older and notably thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi managed to build it a bit lighter anyway. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has an older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has a larger screen, much more screen brightness, a just a little better number of pixels per inch of display and a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light captures, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5260mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is also a lot cheaper, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.