Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3, with an 80.3 score against 78.2. Google Nexus 6P is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Poco M3, but it is lighter and thinner anyway. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a bigger storage for apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M3 and the Google Nexus 6P count with quite similar processors, and although the Google Nexus 6P has 1 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a little bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Poco M3. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.