Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-27 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cool blue, Power black and Yellow | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 149.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3's score of 78.2. The Google Pixel XL body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Poco M3, even though it was released many years before. Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has more CPU cores.
Google Pixel XL counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel number in each inch in the display. Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited situations.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a much better battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 74 percent bigger battery size.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, else you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Poco M3, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.